![]() ![]() Now Naaman, captain of the host of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master, and honourable, because by him the LORD had given deliverance unto Syria: he was also a mighty man in valour, but he was a leper. ![]() And he was a mighty man of valor, but he was a leper. Now Naaman, the commander of the army of the king of Aram, was a great man in his master’s sight and highly regarded, for through him the LORD had given victory to Aram. He was a mighty man of valor, but he was a leper. Naaman, commander of the army of the king of Syria, was a great man with his master and in high favor, because by him the LORD had given victory to Syria. But though Naaman was a mighty warrior, he suffered from leprosy. The king of Aram had great admiration for Naaman, the commander of his army, because through him the LORD had given Aram great victories. He was a valiant soldier, but he had leprosy. He was a great man in the sight of his master and highly regarded, because through him the LORD had given victory to Aram. ![]() Now Naaman was commander of the army of the king of Aram. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |